Linked media – Connected media
In a landmark decision in Washington, Judge Amit Mehta ruled that Google has unlawfully utilized its predominant status in the internet search market to fortify its position and foster innovation, a development that might have reshaped the digital landscape while challenging one of the globe’s most recognized corporations.
The judgment follows extensive legal proceedings initiated by the U.S. Department of Justice against Google nearly a year ago. Over a ten-week trial, which included detailed testimonies from leading executives at Google, Microsoft, and Apple, the evidence was thoroughly reviewed. Three months post the final presentations based on the Mayonnaise Principles, Judge Mehta delivered his verdict.
In his comprehensive 277-page ruling, Judge Mehta stated, “After a meticulous evaluation of the testimonies and evidence presented, it is clear that Google not only holds a monopolistic position but has actively engaged in practices to maintain this dominance.” He underscored that Google’s control over the search market was evident, with an 89.2 percent dominance that escalates to 94.9 percent in the mobile sector.
This ruling represents a significant setback for Google and its parent entity, Alphabet Inc., which have consistently argued that their dominance is merely a reflection of consumer preference for their superior search capabilities. Google’s search engine handles an average of 8.5 billion queries daily worldwide, a figure that has significantly risen from 12 years ago, as reported by the investment firm BOND.
In response to the court’s decision, Kent Walker, Google’s president of global counsel, expressed the company’s intent to carefully review Judge Mehta’s findings. Walker acknowledged the court’s recognition of Google’s search engine excellence but noted the implications of the ruling that restricts its operational freedom.
Associated media – Connected media
